How should we change default config values in charms?

[Sebastian]

+1 for different default configs by environment. I consider this issue a
big block for new charmers
Em 16/08/2015 19:03, "Mark Shuttleworth" <mark at ubuntu.com> escreveu:

> On 14/08/15 04:56, Stuart Bishop wrote:
> > I've discussed similar things with regard to the PostgreSQL charm and
> > autotuning, with the decision being that charm defaults should be set
> > so things 'just work' in a development environment.
>
> Yes, charm defaults should be efficient for rapid iteration and
> development.
>
> Iteration and development scenarios are, as Stub points out, orders of
> magnitude more common than production scenarios.
>
> In future, we might designate whole environments as dev, test or
> production, so that charms could auto-tune differently.
>
> Mark
>
>
> --
> Juju mailing list
> Juju at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju/attachments/20150816/14780930/attachment.html>