An Open Question: Charm Dependency Management

[Marco Ceppi]

Well there are two notions of testing, unit_test and functional_test one is
largely more expensive than the other. Outside of that test-depends is a
good one. Whatever it is we should identify those so we can make sure
bundletester is updated to sniff these targets out (if this is the route we
chose).

On Tue Jan 20 2015 at 1:18:05 PM David Britton <david.britton at canonical.com>
wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 20, 2015 at 05:58:24PM +0000, Marco Ceppi wrote:
> > I don't see how a Makefile in a charm doesn't resolve this issue.
>
> +1 on some standard published Makefile targets.  We already have some
> that are highly recommended:
>
>  - test
>  - lint
>
> Maybe:
>
>  - test-depends or depends  # to install/update dependencies needed for
>                               testing
>
> Are there others that are needed/missing or that I forgot we already
> have as standard?
>
> --
> David Britton <david.britton at canonical.com>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju/attachments/20150120/158ed5b1/attachment.html>