Makefile target names
Wes Mason
wesley.mason at canonical.com
Thu Jan 22 16:41:48 UTC 2015
On 22 January 2015 at 16:36, Simon Davy <bloodearnest at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 22 January 2015 at 16:29, David Britton <david.britton at canonical.com>
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 22, 2015 at 04:17:26PM +0000, Simon Davy wrote:
> >> On 22 January 2015 at 15:13, David Britton <david.britton at canonical.com>
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > lint:
> >> > - make lint
> >> >
> >>
> >> Could we also make[1] the charm linter lint the makefile for the
> >> presence of targets agreed in the outcome of this thread?
> >
> > "charm proof"
> >
> > I like it. (bundle tester already runs this)
>
> Which is interesting, as my lint targets general runs charm proof too,
> so it'd be run twice in that case?
>
> Not a big issue, but if the charm store/review queue is automatically
> charm-proofing too, perhaps the make lint target should not be?
>
> --
> Simon
>
>
Whelp it's still nice to have as part of lint when developing the charm,
and charm-proof isn't exactly the slowest process to run multiple times.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju/attachments/20150122/4544cf8e/attachment.html>
More information about the Juju
mailing list