Python 3 default for all layered / reactive charms

Adam Stokes adam.stokes at canonical.com
Tue Nov 17 01:16:50 UTC 2015


Im for it and the majority of my charm layers are py3 ready(ish).

On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Cory Johns <cory.johns at canonical.com>
wrote:

> https://github.com/juju-solutions/reactive-base-layer/issues/5
>
> I am for using Python 3 in the base layer, but we need to address the
> effect that would have on the charms currently written using layers.  I
> don't think the community effort to handle the switch at this point would
> be large, but we could also fork the base layer have a "basic-py2" layer
> for a period to ease the transition.
>
> Thoughts or concerns?
>
> --
> Juju mailing list
> Juju at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju/attachments/20151116/2ba6d62e/attachment.html>


More information about the Juju mailing list