Static IP addressing? with Mellanox

[Narinder Gupta]

Indeed, the IPoIB is part of the Mellanox charm work, as well as the driver
work underneath it all.
We are also pursuing Ceph/RDMA with Mellanox and I'm sure it will also
appear in our Intel relationship.

charms are available at https://code.launchpad.net/~mellanox-canonical


Thanks and Regards,
Narinder Gupta (PMP)                   narinder.gupta at canonical.com
Canonical, Ltd.                    narindergupta [irc.freenode.net]
+1.281.736.5150                            narindergupta2007[skype]

Ubuntu- Linux for human beings | www.ubuntu.com | www.canonical.com


On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 1:31 PM, Mark Shuttleworth <mark at ubuntu.com> wrote:

> On 17/11/15 10:38, ed bond wrote:
> >       I honestly think ceph/neutron having RDMA support would be more
> important. I figured I could hack together IPoIB quicker since it was an
> Operating System layer and not changing all the Open Stack charms.
>
> I believe this work is in progress between Mellanox and Canonical.
>
> Mark
>
> --
> Juju mailing list
> Juju at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju/attachments/20151117/fd45f8cf/attachment.html>