Model statuses
Andrew Wilkins
andrew.wilkins at canonical.com
Thu Apr 14 00:44:07 UTC 2016
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 7:43 PM Mark Shuttleworth <mark at ubuntu.com> wrote:
>
> The guidance is that we want it to be VERY clear to people, when someone
> quotes just a status, what they are talking about. There is a very
> different situation in progress when a unit state is being described
> than the state of the whole application. Imagine a telephone
> conversation between two stressed people; you want the word they use,
> even without much context, to tell as much as possible to the other
> person about what they are dealing with.
>
> In this case, I don't think there is as much risk of confusion between
> the state of the model and the state of the application, as there is
> between app and unit. For that reason, I think it's "OK" but not great
> to use the same terms for model and application.
>
Thanks for the feedback. I think I see where this is coming from now, with
juju/agent vs. workload status. I'll go ahead with what I've proposed for
2.0.0rc1 (or whatever we're calling it). I doubt there will be any
confusion, but we'll have some time to test it out and rework it as
necessary.
Cheers,
Andrew
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju/attachments/20160414/84a2a068/attachment.html>
More information about the Juju
mailing list