2.0 as default on main repos?

[Steve Pe]

I'm newbi what is command to install latest beta version of Juju on ubuntu?
 thx

On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Rick Harding <rick.harding at canonical.com>
wrote:

> Thanks for the feedback Jose. Merlijn also brought up a similar note and I
> replied on the main juju list to help explain the current pain window we're
> working through. Rather than copy/paste you can see it here:
>
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju/2016-August/007679.html
>
> Please let me know if you'd like to chat. I understand that it feels very
> awkward right now, but it's part 'by the plan' as far as the plan went, but
> also 'not by the plan' as we'd hoped to have Juju 2.0 GA for folks at this
> time. We're very close now and the feedback from users of 2.0 has been
> essential to getting so much right and better for everyone.
>
> Jose, let me know if you want to reach out and chat about the transition
> and why things are setup they way they are. We really appreciate the
> feedback and patience as we go through the 1.X to 2.X transition.
>
> Rick
>
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 11:32 AM José Antonio Rey <jose at ubuntu.com> wrote:
>
>> Hey Matt,
>>
>> Thanks for the link.
>>
>> If anyone reading has a way to help get it fixed, please do so. This is a
>> horrible bug that causes inconsistencies, and until 2.0 is released it
>> should not be in main.
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 8, 2016, 09:22 Matt Bruzek <matthew.bruzek at canonical.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hello José,
>>>
>>> I ran into this problem myself and filed a bug with the packaging.
>>>
>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/juju-release-tools/+bug/1609437
>>>
>>> While I still think this is a bug, I did find a work around which I put
>>> in the bug for other people having this same problem. Hope that helps!
>>>
>>>    - Matt Bruzek <matthew.bruzek at canonical.com>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 7:49 PM, José Antonio Rey <jose at ubuntu.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hello everyone,
>>>>
>>>> I am deploying some production servers and am seeing a weird behavior:
>>>>
>>>> 2.0~beta12-0ubuntu1.16.04.1 is the default for the 'main' repositories
>>>> of archive.ubuntu.com
>>>>
>>>> 1.25.6-0ubuntu1~16.04.1~juju1 is the default for ppa:juju/stable
>>>>
>>>> Is this intended? Doesn't feel right to me.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance for the insight!
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Juju mailing list
>>>> Juju at lists.ubuntu.com
>>>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/
>>>> mailman/listinfo/juju
>>>>
>>>> --
>> Juju mailing list
>> Juju at lists.ubuntu.com
>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/
>> mailman/listinfo/juju
>>
>
> --
> Juju mailing list
> Juju at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/
> mailman/listinfo/juju
>
>


-- 
Best wishes;

Steve Pe
( https://www.linkedin.com/in/stevepe )

"Doing good to others is not a duty, it is a joy, for it increases our own
health and happiness."
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju/attachments/20160808/591e45db/attachment.html>