TLS Terminated Etcd (If you use etcd this affects you)
Charles Butler
charles.butler at canonical.com
Thu Jun 16 15:10:31 UTC 2016
Thanks again for the feedback,
I'm going to cut and push this release of the Etcd charm and issue a follow
up announcement to the list advising pinning/avoiding upgrade if end users
wish to keep non-tls connections.
Cheers!
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 2:34 AM Jay Wren <jay.wren at canonical.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Casey Marshall <
> casey.marshall at canonical.com> wrote:
>
>> The overhead of a TLS handshake can be minimal, it just depends on the
>> algorithm & key lengths used. This should be configurable in the layer, I
>> think. EC and 2048-bit RSA have reasonable handshake times.
>>
>>
> I take it all back. I just had a chat with coworkers who reminded me that
> etcd supports http2 already and that the performance improvements of http2
> could be very significant. Given that, I thank you greatly for these TLS
> changes and look forward to using them
> --
> Jay
>
--
Juju Charmer
Canonical Group Ltd.
Ubuntu - Linux for human beings | www.ubuntu.com
Juju - The fastest way to model your service | www.jujucharms.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju/attachments/20160616/43dc88f1/attachment.html>
More information about the Juju
mailing list