[Review Queue] rlec, nrpe-external, nagios, squid-reverseproxy, ubuntu-repository-cache, ibm-im
Nate Finch
nate.finch at canonical.com
Fri Jun 24 20:34:33 UTC 2016
- Previous message: [Review Queue] rlec, nrpe-external, nagios, squid-reverseproxy, ubuntu-repository-cache, ibm-im
- Next message: [Review Queue] rlec, nrpe-external, nagios, squid-reverseproxy, ubuntu-repository-cache, ibm-im
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
Yeah, resource-get is specifically optimized to be able to be called as
often as you want. Each one makes a network call to the controller, but
unless the resource has changed, no data will be downloaded.
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 4:24 PM Jay Wren <jay.wren at canonical.com> wrote:
> Could you expand on the resource-get inefficiencies?
>
> The resource-get docs say this:
>
> If "resource-get" for a resource has not been run before (for the unit)
>>
>> then the resource is downloaded from the controller at the revision
>>
>> associated with the unit's application. That file is stored in the unit's
>>
>> local cache. If "resource-get" *has* been run before then each
>>
>> subsequent run syncs the resource with the controller. This ensures
>>
>> that the revision of the unit-local copy of the resource matches the
>>
>> revision of the resource associated with the unit's application.
>>
>>
>> Either way, the path provided by "resource-get" references the
>>
>> up-to-date file for the resource. Note that the resource may get
>>
>> updated on the controller for the application at any time, meaning the
>>
>> cached copy *may* be out of date at any time after you call
>>
>> "resource-get". Consequently, the command should be run at every
>>
>> point where it is critical that the resource be up to date.
>>
>
> Expanding on the inefficiencies given the above optimizations may help
> other charm writers be aware of things which may be inefficient.
>
> Thanks,
> --
> Jay
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 1:59 PM, Kevin Monroe <kevin.monroe at canonical.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Andrew, Cory, Kostas, Pete, and I went through the queue. Here's what we
>> found:
>>
>>
>> -
>>
>> RLEC (Kostas)
>> -
>>
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+bug/1551133
>> -
>>
>> This charm deploys Redis Labs Enterprise Cluster that enables you
>> to install an enterprise-grade cluster for managing and running multiple
>> Redis databases.
>> -
>>
>> The charm seems functional. Deploys correctly and scales.
>> -
>>
>> There are still a few points that need the attention of the author:
>> -
>>
>> Opening ports
>> -
>>
>> Better testing
>> -
>>
>> Align with the new promulgation process
>> -
>>
>> nrpe-external (Cory)
>> -
>>
>>
>> https://code.launchpad.net/~aluria/charms/precise/nrpe-external-master/donotremove-hostdefs/+merge/290957
>> -
>>
>> The PR had already been approved, but to merge in accordance with
>> the new process, it needs to be moved out of the ~charmers namespace. This
>> brought to light that the maintainer is no longer recommending this and
>> users should transition to cs:trusty/nrpe, raising the question of how to
>> handle the transition. We will apply the PR but move this to ~unmaintained
>> with an announcement to transition and a possible grace period.
>> -
>>
>> squid-reverseproxy (Pete)
>> -
>>
>>
>> https://code.launchpad.net/~dbuliga/charms/trusty/squid-reverseproxy/centos/+merge/287481
>> -
>>
>> Marked as “needs fixing” due to failing tests (missing an import
>> on trusty).
>> -
>>
>> nagios (Pete)
>> -
>>
>>
>> https://code.launchpad.net/~dbuliga/charms/trusty/nagios/nagios/+merge/288614
>> -
>>
>> Code looks good -- is blocked by nrpe-external being merged,
>> however.
>> -
>>
>> Ubuntu-repository-cache (Andrew)
>> -
>>
>>
>> https://code.launchpad.net/~daniel-thewatkins/charms/trusty/ubuntu-repository-cache/error-message-fix/+merge/292622
>> -
>>
>> Due to the large amount of files that need to be synced this fails
>> with a timeout error. Should try to limit the amount of repos synced for
>> the test.
>> -
>>
>> IBM Installation Manager (Kevin)
>> -
>>
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/charms/+bug/1575746
>> -
>>
>> We noticed our previous MP was inefficiently calling resource-get
>> multiple times for the fixpack (which is a real problem with large
>> resources). Fixed.
>> -
>>
>> IBM found a bug in our previous MP where we sentry’d the wrong
>> status message in the ibm-im amulet test. Fixed.
>> - Awaiting merge decision.
>>
>>
>> Let us know if you have any questions. Thanks!
>> -Kevin
>>
>> --
>> Juju mailing list
>> Juju at lists.ubuntu.com
>> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
>>
>>
> --
> Juju mailing list
> Juju at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju/attachments/20160624/fdc8563a/attachment.html>
- Previous message: [Review Queue] rlec, nrpe-external, nagios, squid-reverseproxy, ubuntu-repository-cache, ibm-im
- Next message: [Review Queue] rlec, nrpe-external, nagios, squid-reverseproxy, ubuntu-repository-cache, ibm-im
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the Juju
mailing list