Reviewed designs ibm-was-nd, ibm-xcat, ibm-was-wxs, ibm-dsm and ibm-pac

[Matt Bruzek]

Kevin Monroe and I reviewed several charm designs, and one bundle design
from our parters at IBM.

All these designs use the reactive framework and are well thought out. Most
got our +1 but we had a few questions about ibm-pac that was unclear.

Here is the summary:

was-nd
- approved last week, but thanks for the new diagram
-
https://docs.google.com/document/d/17Uh_EghiBKZiDf8ZiM6T-VQzVfoTj4gOlwTl9oieBwc/comment

xcat
- replies to previous comments seem sound
-
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DgK79jsP2mnxfu_5uHWDSgMriy1VN3kYUK2On2OCSU8/comment

was-wxs
- a few comments, but nothing blocking.  please let us know if you have
questions about our comments
-
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Zc396dKOHQU-PI1MvVT02q966FAs_H5f2X2L1ERcXBI/comment

web infrastructure bundle
- minor comments to keep in mind when implementing this bundle, but this
looks *really* interesting and is well thought-out.  nice job!
-
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1WWo8PSAjRrb0D4swdX2mghPgEbgT5LA2vD9wHsv8Qlc/comment

ibm-dsm:
- minor comments, overall +1
-
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qQY5gJNDVTDPECWDmLzkNWWwGHukWHHucRQIosuL1RU/comment

ibm-pac:
- We had a few questions about co-location of charms on this design. While
you can use --to   we generally use a subordinate for proper co-location.
We will wait to hear back from the partners if the can use a subordinate
charm.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1E46oFIUr0h_MpCLiGTnp2vD-UrKdLCuNP3T3hD4etqo/comment

Thanks,

   - Matt Bruzek <matthew.bruzek at canonical.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju/attachments/20160504/37264806/attachment.html>