Layer-basic options

[James Beedy]

Thanks Merlijn! That makes total sense! A user/group mgmt layer would
probably be quite useful.

On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Merlijn Sebrechts <
merlijn.sebrechts at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi James
>
> I like that functionality and I think it should get its own layer. Not
> sure if the basic layer is the right place for this.
>
> I had a similar suggestion a while back, but others have convinced me that
> the basic layer should only include the bare minimum needed for the
> reactive framework to function (cross platform).
>
> There is no need to pull in that extra weight when you want to use the
> reactive framework to drive Puppet, Ansible or whatever cfgmgmt tool you
> like. Juju has great tools for both service orchestration and config
> management, but I think we should try to keep them seperate so people can
> choose to only use Juju for service orchestration layer. I think the
> integration with Bigtop is a great example of how Juju can succeed by
> leveraging other cfgmgmt tools.
>
> What do you think?
>
>
> Regards
> Merlijn
>
>
> Op zondag 29 mei 2016 heeft James Beedy <jamesbeedy at gmail.com> het
> volgende geschreven:
> > I feel like the config options exposed through
> jujubigdata.utils.DistConfig would be valuable to include in layer-basic.
> How do others feel about this?
> > I have created the following issues to track this:
> > https://github.com/juju-solutions/jujubigdata/issues/58
> > https://github.com/juju-solutions/layer-basic/issues/72
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju/attachments/20160528/40293ecf/attachment.html>