Feedback wanted: Changes to the Ubuntu Charm

[Ryan Beisner]

Was there a merge proposal or pull request for these changes in the charm's
upstream repo?  If not, is there a branch that can be proposed against the
charm repo?  Or, is there a new upstream repo for the charm?

The candidate charm in the store is helpful to validate functionality, but
as a contributor to the existing charm, I simply cannot determine where I
might base future changes, or rebase existing works in progress.

-1 to this moving forward, from an upstream charm code contributor
perspective, pending clarification/completion of the upstream repo and
review.

Setting aside those issues of principle, I've confirmed that it does work
with 1.25.6: Precise, Trusty, Xenial units.  Having this in place will be a
nice touch.

Cheers,

Ryan


On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 4:24 PM, Tim Penhey <tim.penhey at canonical.com>
wrote:

> Marco,
>
> This is awesome. I use the ubuntu charm all the time for testing, and
> seeing the workload version and workload status being set is pretty cool.
>
> I had hoped that seeing the "unknown" status would apply gentle pressure
> to get people to set a workload status.
>
> Winning!!!
>
> Tim
>
> On 15/09/16 08:39, Marco Ceppi wrote:
>
>> Hi Ryan,
>>
>> I have granted everyone access to the candidate channel. Could you try
>> again?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Marco Ceppi
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:26 PM Ryan Beisner <ryan.beisner at canonical.com
>> <mailto:ryan.beisner at canonical.com>> wrote:
>>
>>     Is there a merge proposal or pull request for the changes?  I'd like
>>     to validate with 1.25.6 as the current stable release, but --channel
>>     isn't a thing there.
>>
>>     I tried to `charm pull ubuntu --channel candidate` but received:
>>      ERROR cannot get archive: unauthorized: access denied.
>>
>>     Thanks,
>>
>>     Ryan
>>
>>
>>     On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 8:57 AM, Marco Ceppi
>>     <marco.ceppi at canonical.com <mailto:marco.ceppi at canonical.com>> wrote:
>>
>>         Hey everyone,
>>
>>         Normally, I wouldn't bother with an update like this, but it's
>>         slightly larger than I'd care to just push out. Today, the
>>         Ubuntu charm is a no-op, which is largely the goal of the charm.
>>         However, as juju becomes more rich this no-op charm starts to
>>         look incomplete. I know a few people depend on the Ubuntu charm
>>         for setup purposes and testing. I'd hate to be the source of
>>         breakage for that charm so I'm announcing an update here.
>>
>>         Screenshot from 2016-09-14 09-48-31.png
>>
>>         Other than the obvious changes to status, this also implements
>>         workload version.
>>
>>         If you depend on the Ubuntu charm for anything I urge you to
>>         test the latest version with
>>
>>         `juju deploy ubuntu --channel candidate`
>>
>>         If I don't receive any negative feedback by the end of this week
>>         I'll move what's in candidate to stable.
>>
>>         Thanks,
>>         Marco Ceppi
>>
>>         --
>>         Juju mailing list
>>         Juju at lists.ubuntu.com <mailto:Juju at lists.ubuntu.com>
>>         Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>>         https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
>>
>>
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju/attachments/20160916/5dd5c079/attachment.html>