Feedback wanted: Changes to the Ubuntu Charm

[Marco Ceppi]

The repo has been updated: https://github.com/marcoceppi/charm-ubuntu

On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 3:00 PM Marco Ceppi <marco.ceppi at canonical.com>
wrote:

> I am the upstream (for this charm) and this is an entire rework of the
> charm including a repo change. Future mp will be against this repo
> https://github.com/marcoceppi/charm-ubuntu the readme is up to date:
> http://juju charms.com/u/marcoceppi/ubuntu/1
>
> I'll have the repo fixed tomorrow.
>
>
> Marco
>
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016, 1:36 PM Ryan Beisner <ryan.beisner at canonical.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Was there a merge proposal or pull request for these changes in the
>> charm's upstream repo?  If not, is there a branch that can be proposed
>> against the charm repo?  Or, is there a new upstream repo for the charm?
>>
>> The candidate charm in the store is helpful to validate functionality,
>> but as a contributor to the existing charm, I simply cannot determine where
>> I might base future changes, or rebase existing works in progress.
>>
>> -1 to this moving forward, from an upstream charm code contributor
>> perspective, pending clarification/completion of the upstream repo and
>> review.
>>
>> Setting aside those issues of principle, I've confirmed that it does work
>> with 1.25.6: Precise, Trusty, Xenial units.  Having this in place will be a
>> nice touch.
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Ryan
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 4:24 PM, Tim Penhey <tim.penhey at canonical.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Marco,
>>>
>>> This is awesome. I use the ubuntu charm all the time for testing, and
>>> seeing the workload version and workload status being set is pretty cool.
>>>
>>> I had hoped that seeing the "unknown" status would apply gentle pressure
>>> to get people to set a workload status.
>>>
>>> Winning!!!
>>>
>>> Tim
>>>
>>> On 15/09/16 08:39, Marco Ceppi wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Ryan,
>>>>
>>>> I have granted everyone access to the candidate channel. Could you try
>>>> again?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Marco Ceppi
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:26 PM Ryan Beisner <
>>>> ryan.beisner at canonical.com
>>>> <mailto:ryan.beisner at canonical.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>     Is there a merge proposal or pull request for the changes?  I'd like
>>>>     to validate with 1.25.6 as the current stable release, but --channel
>>>>     isn't a thing there.
>>>>
>>>>     I tried to `charm pull ubuntu --channel candidate` but received:
>>>>      ERROR cannot get archive: unauthorized: access denied.
>>>>
>>>>     Thanks,
>>>>
>>>>     Ryan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>     On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 8:57 AM, Marco Ceppi
>>>>     <marco.ceppi at canonical.com <mailto:marco.ceppi at canonical.com>>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         Hey everyone,
>>>>
>>>>         Normally, I wouldn't bother with an update like this, but it's
>>>>         slightly larger than I'd care to just push out. Today, the
>>>>         Ubuntu charm is a no-op, which is largely the goal of the charm.
>>>>         However, as juju becomes more rich this no-op charm starts to
>>>>         look incomplete. I know a few people depend on the Ubuntu charm
>>>>         for setup purposes and testing. I'd hate to be the source of
>>>>         breakage for that charm so I'm announcing an update here.
>>>>
>>>>         Screenshot from 2016-09-14 09-48-31.png
>>>>
>>>>         Other than the obvious changes to status, this also implements
>>>>         workload version.
>>>>
>>>>         If you depend on the Ubuntu charm for anything I urge you to
>>>>         test the latest version with
>>>>
>>>>         `juju deploy ubuntu --channel candidate`
>>>>
>>>>         If I don't receive any negative feedback by the end of this week
>>>>         I'll move what's in candidate to stable.
>>>>
>>>>         Thanks,
>>>>         Marco Ceppi
>>>>
>>>>         --
>>>>         Juju mailing list
>>>>         Juju at lists.ubuntu.com <mailto:Juju at lists.ubuntu.com>
>>>>         Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>>>>         https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju/attachments/20160917/c309f2eb/attachment.html>