Feedback wanted: Changes to the Ubuntu Charm

[Marco Ceppi]

Obsoleted, their aliases eventually removed

On Mon, Sep 19, 2016, 4:03 AM Ryan Beisner <ryan.beisner at canonical.com>
wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 2:00 PM, Marco Ceppi <marco.ceppi at canonical.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I am the upstream (for this charm) and this is an entire rework of the
>> charm including a repo change.
>>
>
> Ok, thanks for the info.  What will become of the old repos?:
>
> https://code.launchpad.net/~charmers/charms/trusty/ubuntu/trunk
> lp:charms/trusty/ubuntu
>
> https://code.launchpad.net/~charmers/charms/precise/ubuntu/trunk
> lp:charms/ubuntu
>
>
>
>
>> Future mp will be against this repo
>> https://github.com/marcoceppi/charm-ubuntu the readme is up to date:
>> http://juju charms.com/u/marcoceppi/ubuntu/1
>>
>> I'll have the repo fixed tomorrow.
>>
>>
>> Marco
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016, 1:36 PM Ryan Beisner <ryan.beisner at canonical.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Was there a merge proposal or pull request for these changes in the
>>> charm's upstream repo?  If not, is there a branch that can be proposed
>>> against the charm repo?  Or, is there a new upstream repo for the charm?
>>>
>>> The candidate charm in the store is helpful to validate functionality,
>>> but as a contributor to the existing charm, I simply cannot determine where
>>> I might base future changes, or rebase existing works in progress.
>>>
>>> -1 to this moving forward, from an upstream charm code contributor
>>> perspective, pending clarification/completion of the upstream repo and
>>> review.
>>>
>>> Setting aside those issues of principle, I've confirmed that it does
>>> work with 1.25.6: Precise, Trusty, Xenial units.  Having this in place will
>>> be a nice touch.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Ryan
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 4:24 PM, Tim Penhey <tim.penhey at canonical.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Marco,
>>>>
>>>> This is awesome. I use the ubuntu charm all the time for testing, and
>>>> seeing the workload version and workload status being set is pretty cool.
>>>>
>>>> I had hoped that seeing the "unknown" status would apply gentle
>>>> pressure to get people to set a workload status.
>>>>
>>>> Winning!!!
>>>>
>>>> Tim
>>>>
>>>> On 15/09/16 08:39, Marco Ceppi wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Ryan,
>>>>>
>>>>> I have granted everyone access to the candidate channel. Could you try
>>>>> again?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Marco Ceppi
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 3:26 PM Ryan Beisner <
>>>>> ryan.beisner at canonical.com
>>>>> <mailto:ryan.beisner at canonical.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>     Is there a merge proposal or pull request for the changes?  I'd
>>>>> like
>>>>>     to validate with 1.25.6 as the current stable release, but
>>>>> --channel
>>>>>     isn't a thing there.
>>>>>
>>>>>     I tried to `charm pull ubuntu --channel candidate` but received:
>>>>>      ERROR cannot get archive: unauthorized: access denied.
>>>>>
>>>>>     Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>>     Ryan
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>     On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 8:57 AM, Marco Ceppi
>>>>>     <marco.ceppi at canonical.com <mailto:marco.ceppi at canonical.com>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>         Hey everyone,
>>>>>
>>>>>         Normally, I wouldn't bother with an update like this, but it's
>>>>>         slightly larger than I'd care to just push out. Today, the
>>>>>         Ubuntu charm is a no-op, which is largely the goal of the
>>>>> charm.
>>>>>         However, as juju becomes more rich this no-op charm starts to
>>>>>         look incomplete. I know a few people depend on the Ubuntu charm
>>>>>         for setup purposes and testing. I'd hate to be the source of
>>>>>         breakage for that charm so I'm announcing an update here.
>>>>>
>>>>>         Screenshot from 2016-09-14 09-48-31.png
>>>>>
>>>>>         Other than the obvious changes to status, this also implements
>>>>>         workload version.
>>>>>
>>>>>         If you depend on the Ubuntu charm for anything I urge you to
>>>>>         test the latest version with
>>>>>
>>>>>         `juju deploy ubuntu --channel candidate`
>>>>>
>>>>>         If I don't receive any negative feedback by the end of this
>>>>> week
>>>>>         I'll move what's in candidate to stable.
>>>>>
>>>>>         Thanks,
>>>>>         Marco Ceppi
>>>>>
>>>>>         --
>>>>>         Juju mailing list
>>>>>         Juju at lists.ubuntu.com <mailto:Juju at lists.ubuntu.com>
>>>>>         Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
>>>>>         https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju/attachments/20160919/b4a5bcfe/attachment.html>