Feedback wanted: Changes to the Ubuntu Charm

[Ryan Beisner]

On Thu, Sep 22, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Cory Johns <cory.johns at canonical.com>
wrote:

> For clarity, I'd just like to note that https://jujucharms.com/ubuntu/8
> is the candidate revision, and you can deploy this on 1.25.6 (without
> --channel support) by being specific about the revision number:
>

Great.  How can I determine that rev is the current candidate?



>
>     juju deploy cs:ubuntu-8
>
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Rick Harding <rick.harding at canonical.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Typically you'd be able to tell the source for charms set via
>>
>> charm show ubuntu homepage
>> charm show ubuntu bugs-url
>>
>> In this case they're both set to https://ubuntu.com so not helpful in
>> getting to the source.
>>
>
> I feel like this highlights the fact that there is some ambiguity in these
> fields.  Many charms set these (or at least homepage) to point to the
> upstream project.  Of course, ideally, the charm would be a part of its
> respective upstream project, but that may not be the case for various
> reasons and in those cases it would be helpful to differentiate the
> upstream project URL, and possibly upstream bug tracker, from the charm
> repo URL and bug tracker.
>
> On a related note, though, the homepage field is no longer displayed
> anywhere that I can find on jujucharms.com.  Why is it not included in
> the Contribute sidebar?
>

Appears to be a regression in the latest charm store.  I believe rick_h
raised a bug, but I'm not readily finding that.



>
> --
> Juju mailing list
> Juju at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/
> mailman/listinfo/juju
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju/attachments/20160922/5b8fc54f/attachment.html>