[Review Queue]: ibm-platform-*, dokuwiki, kubes-*, znc, giraph, easyrsa, flannel, ganglia
Kevin Monroe
kevin.monroe at canonical.com
Fri Jan 27 16:22:46 UTC 2017
Hi Juju!
Cory, Kostas, Pete, and myself ran through the queue yesterday. We have
lots of great +1 / promulgation to announce! Here's the rundown:
Jan 26, 2017: Cory, Kevin, Kostas, Pete
-
IBM-platform-lsf-server
-
https://review.jujucharms.com/reviews/18
-
Tests passed, +1, promulgated:
-
https://jujucharms.com/ibm-platform-lsf-server/
-
IBM-platform-lsf-storage
-
https://review.jujucharms.com/reviews/36
-
This is now taking advantage of a new helper method in the nfsstorage
interface, which simplified reactive logic quite a bit.
-
Tests passed, +1, promulgated:
-
https://jujucharms.com/ibm-platform-lsf-storage/
- IBM-platform-lsf
- Just a general observation here: IBM Platform LSF is a 3-charm
solution. The 2 charms above join ibm-platform-lsf-master as promulgated
charms, and the 3 of them would make a great candidate for an
IBM Platform
LSF bundle.
-
Dokuwiki
-
https://review.jujucharms.com/reviews/22
-
Test was failing on AWS due to service not being exposed, but with
Adam’s recent update, tests passed, +1, promulgated:
-
https://jujucharms.com/dokuwiki/
-
Kubernetes-master
-
https://review.jujucharms.com/reviews/27
-
In this round of review, the authors have addressed the lint errors
reported.
-
Given the charm is tested as part of the respective bundle, it is a
+1 from me.
-
Kubernetes-worker
-
https://review.jujucharms.com/reviews/28
-
The charm seems to be better tested in the context of the kubernetes
bundle.
-
Minor fixes (lint errors) are needed, -1 for now.
-
Kubeapi-load-balancer
-
https://review.jujucharms.com/reviews/29?revision=192
-
The charm is tested in the context of the kubernetes bundle.
-
However, documentation needs more work, -1 for now.
-
Znc
-
https://review.jujucharms.com/reviews/24
-
Tests passed, +1, promulgated:
-
https://jujucharms.com/znc/
-
Giraph
-
https://review.jujucharms.com/reviews/82
-
We think this subordinate charm should be standalone, and so created
a PR for the author’s consideration.
-
easyrsa
-
https://review.jujucharms.com/reviews/31
-
Tests from the layer are excluded, so the built charm does not have
any tests.
-
-1 for now.
-
Flannel
-
https://review.jujucharms.com/reviews/30
-
Found two small issues related to tests and idempotency.
-
-1 for now.
-
Ganglia
-
https://review.jujucharms.com/reviews/50
-
Bundletester failed due to missing PyYAML in venv. This could be an
env issue on our part, but -1 while we wait for author input.
-
IBM-platform-rtm
-
https://review.jujucharms.com/reviews/35?revision=71
-
This charm deploys IBM platform on ppc64le.
-
Reviewing the code brought up a few points that need to be addressed
by the author:
-
Manually altering IPTables
-
Stopping services not owned by the charm
-
Syntactic errors
-
-1 while we wait for author input.
Jan 19, 2017: Kostas
-
Kubernetes-worker
-
https://review.jujucharms.com/reviews/28?revision=144
-
The charm seems to be better tested in the context of the kubernetes
bundle.
-
There is a test failing and there are also some lint errors.
- We will have to wait for the author’s input.
Questions/concerns? Please find us on Freenode in #juju.
Thanks!
-Kevin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju/attachments/20170127/c68b1fd8/attachment.html>
More information about the Juju
mailing list