Using Deb Proxy to cache Debs to minimize time starting-up machines and its installation scripts
N. S.
n5pascal at hotmail.com
Thu Jul 6 08:31:28 UTC 2017
Hi,
Thank you Menno, John and James.
Very helpful feedbacks :)
I will try and keep you posted.
Thanks
Naz
On Jul 6, 2017 10:25 AM, James Hebden <james.hebden at canonical.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 11:13:04AM +0400, John Meinel wrote:
> I don't know if there are advantages to squid-deb-proxy vs apt-cacher-ng, I
> just found that "apt install apt-cacher-ng" and then setting the cloud
> config was sufficient. (apt-cacher-ng also puts up a web page at a specific
> port so you can see if the cache is getting used and what the hit/miss rate
> is.)
>
> John
> =:->
I've had issues with accessing PPAs using squid-deb-proxy due to the
default policies it configures - so it's good to be aware of that, lest
you spend a lot of time debugging a specific PPA only to find out it's
squid causing the issues.
I haven't compared against apt-cache-ng, however if you're not seeing
issues with PPAs, that would be a fairly conclusive test :)
James
> --
> Juju mailing list
> Juju at lists.ubuntu.com
> Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/juju
--
James Hebden
Cloud Reliability Engineer
BootStack Squad @ Canonical Ltd.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/juju/attachments/20170706/b2cd0c0b/attachment.html>
More information about the Juju
mailing list