[Bug 43531] Re: Kernel isn't very useful without a boot loader, but doesn't depend on one

[flargen]

Bryan, I don't know if your idea is feasible or not, but surely this is
the sort of option that most normal users would want to avoid? Almost no
one will want no bootloader, only those in the exceptional cases
mentioned above will. Maybe provide this sort of option in the
"alternate install" CD? But personally I prefer the idea of a no-
bootloader package.

-- 
Kernel isn't very useful without a boot loader, but doesn't depend on one
https://launchpad.net/bugs/43531