[Bug 459628] Re: erratic thread scheduling, kernel 2.6.31

[kornelix]

Yes, I have reported several bugs, some of which actually got fixed, but
not because I reported them. 1800 bugs per week is a problem. Some FOSS
developers release buggy apps and hope someone else will fix them. Some
like to wait for the next release. Some are thankfully very
conscientious, like the Canonical staff and volunteers. I do appreciate
your work. I just think the "ecosystem" is broken. 1800 bugs per week =
broken system.

BTW the bug was not invalid, just ignored. With 37600 new bugs and 77701
open bugs, this is understandable. Canonical would need a staff of 1000
just to have a chance of progress.

I also just noticed that the "missing package" is named in the title of
the bug report. I should have entered this in the official place, even
if I was not sure.

thanks and regards
Mike

On 08/29/2010 12:04 PM, Fabio Marconi wrote:
> No, we are few people against too much bugs and majority of us is not payed.
> We do this in free time, and on first obviously we take a look at our package that we have chose to follow.
> On average, over 1,800 bugs are filed every week with more than 600,000 bugs filed so far. The Bug Squad is always in NEED of more help from the community!
> If you want to contribute, as you can and when you can:
> https://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugSquad
> :-) Fabio
>

-- 
erratic thread scheduling, kernel 2.6.31
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459628
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kernel
Bugs, which is subscribed to linux in ubuntu.