valgrind partially broken by current hardy-proposed kernel?
Colin Watson
cjwatson at ubuntu.com
Mon Jun 2 22:05:59 UTC 2008
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 06:00:21PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-06-02 at 09:56 -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > That change was made for the release kernel, so you should see it with
> > -16 too. Blocking NULL is a feature. :)
> >
> > Why is ssh-add trying to allocate memory at 0x0?
>
> >From what I can tell, mmap'ing to 0x0(NULL) is perfectly legitimate.
> >From mmap(2):
>
> ....
> If start is NULL, then the kernel chooses the address at which
> to create the mapping; this is the most portable method of
> creating a new mapping. If start is not NULL, then the kernel
> takes it as a hint about where to place the mapping; on Linux,
> the mapping will be created at the next higher page boundary.
> The address of the new mapping is returned as the result of the
> call.
> ....
That doesn't apply if you use MAP_FIXED, though, does it?
> Being that it is the most portable method, it should probably not fail
> by default :) Perhaps the check should be for values > 0x0, but less
> than some (dangerous?) lower boundary.
I glanced through the code and it looks like the address assignment for
non-MAP_FIXED is done before this check.
Cheers,
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson at ubuntu.com]
More information about the kernel-team
mailing list