[hardy] patches revisited: sensor support for macbook air
Stefan Bader
stefan.bader at canonical.com
Fri Nov 7 13:44:19 UTC 2008
Henrik Rydberg wrote:
> Stefan Bader wrote:
>> Working through my work queues i stumbled over an old patch I had been
>> asked to add to Hardy which somehow got lost in the depths of directories.
>> By now there is a more complete version of this upstream, as well as
>> support for even some more models. The individual patches all are quite
>> simple and I think it might be worth to backport those as SRUs. Thoughts
>> on this?
>>
>> Stefan
>>
>
> All for, of course. I sent a list of 8 patches in Intrepid to be replaced
Of course. ;-)
> by 9 patches upstream a little while ago. Since then, additional patches
> have appeared upstream. Is a LP# required for each patch to revert?
>
> Henrik
>
Personally I'd say for trivial reformatting patches, one LP# would be enough.
Real bugfixes however separate, except those which go into a -stable update,
which we try to handle in batches from -stable.
Tim, what do you say?
Stefan
--
When all other means of communication fail, try words!
More information about the kernel-team
mailing list