[PATCH 0/1] [HARDY SRU] LP#406419 -- usb device detection regression
Stefan Bader
stefan.bader at canonical.com
Thu Aug 20 18:00:05 UTC 2009
Mario Limonciello wrote:
> Considering this regression was caused by a -updates kernel, is there
> a provision of the policy for how long the fix takes to enter updates
> rather than waiting for the next hardy point release?
>
> On 08/19/2009, Stefan Bader <stefan.bader at canonical.com> wrote:
>> Andy Whitcroft wrote:
>>> Following a resent -updates kernel we are not correctly detecting newly
>>> inserted USB devices, requiring a manual rescan to detect them. This is
>>> related to the changes under the commit below:
>>>
>>> UBUNTU: USB: EHCI: add separate IAA watchdog timer
>>>
>>> The following upstream patch has been tested to fix this regression.
>>>
>>> Proposing for SRU to hardy. Pull request below.
>>>
>>> -apw
>>>
>>>
>>> The following changes since commit
>>> 117303a5155683091c24f149ae624bbffcc52667:
>>> Stefan Bader (1):
>>> UBUNTU: Merge 2.6.24-24.57 security release Ignore: yes
>>>
>>> are available in the git repository at:
>>>
>>> git://kernel.ubuntu.com/apw/ubuntu-hardy.git lp406419
>>>
>>> Alan Stern (1):
>>> USB: EHCI: fix remote-wakeup regression
>>>
>>> drivers/usb/host/ehci-hub.c | 6 ++++--
>>> drivers/usb/host/ehci.h | 2 ++
>>> 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>> Applied, thanks
>>
>> --
>>
>> When all other means of communication fail, try words!
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> kernel-team mailing list
>> kernel-team at lists.ubuntu.com
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kernel-team
>>
>
The patch has been uploaded in a Hardy kernel to proposed today. After
accepting this into proposed, it depends also on bug-reporters/testers how long
it takes to get moved to updates.
-Stefan
--
When all other means of communication fail, try words!
More information about the kernel-team
mailing list