[PATCH] UBUNTU: [Karmic SRU] backlight failed after suspend to ram on IBM X40
Leann Ogasawara
leann.ogasawara at canonical.com
Thu Dec 10 21:15:05 UTC 2009
On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 20:46 +0800, AceLan Kao wrote:
> Dear Stefan,
>
>
> My mistake, I re-attach the file.
> Indeed, the patch is cherry-picked from the upstream kernel, and it's
> hash value is
> 0eb96d6ed38430b72897adde58f5477a6b71757a
>
Hi AceLan,
As Stefan mentioned, per our new SRU policy [1], it's preferred if this
goes into upstream stable first (stable at kernel.org). We'll then get
this patch automatically the next time we rebase with upstream stable.
I believe there is going to be a 2.6.31.8 release so there should be
enough time to get this in.
Thanks,
Leann
[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/specs/KernelLucidSruPolicyReview
> 2009/12/10 Stefan Bader <stefan.bader at canonical.com>
> AceLan Kao wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > SRU Justification:
> >
> > IMPACT: Turns out some machines, like the ThinkPad X40 don't
> come back if
> > you don't save/restore this register.
> >
> > FIX: The patch save and restore one more value of the
> register while
> > suspending and resuming.
> >
> > TEST: User on the launchpad acked the patch works for him.
> >
> > git://kernel.ubuntu.com/acelan/ubuntu-karmic.git lp292256
> >
> > Best regards,
> > AceLan Kao.
> >
> >
>
> Looks, like you accidentally picked the swapfile. Beside of
> that, is that
> patch new and if so has it been sent to upstream CC:
> stable at kernel.org?
>
> -Stefan
>
>
>
> --
> Chia-Lin Kao(AceLan)
> http://blog.acelan.idv.tw/
> E-Mail: acelan.kaoATcanonical.com (s/AT/@/)
>
More information about the kernel-team
mailing list