Intrepid vs. Jaunty kernels (monolithic vs. built-in)

[(=?iso-8859-1?q?=60=60-=5F-=B4=B4?=) -- BUGabundo]

Olá Scott e a todos.

On Tuesday 06 January 2009 16:14:39 Scott James Remnant wrote:
> It's also worth comparing the Intrepid and Jaunty kernels in general.
> This has some key figures because we're switching to more modules
> built-in than before.

I've been keeping records[1] (bootchart) of my system ever since Hardy.
Keep in mind that I use mostly development versions (as opposed to stable) and that bootchart recently started to measure a bit earlier, plus I changed my bootchart script so that it keeps recording for a bit longer in other to measure the Desktop apps.
My system is a C2D 2.4GHz, 4GiBs RAM, NVidia 8400m G, 320GiBs SATA (with / ext3, /home XFS and 8GiBs /swap), currently running ubuntu jaunty.

[1]http://fileland.bugabundo.net/fotos/Linux/bootchart

HTH.

-- 
Hi, I'm BUGabundo, and I am Ubuntu (whyubuntu.com)
(``-_-´´)	http://LinuxNoDEI.BUGabundo.net
Linux user #443786    GPG key 1024D/A1784EBB
My new micro-blog @ http://BUGabundo.net
ps. My emails tend to sound authority and aggressive. I'm sorry in advance. I'll try to be more assertive as time goes by...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/attachments/20090205/09276e3a/attachment.sig>