List of kernel bugs tagged suspend, resume, or hibernate

[Andy Whitcroft]

On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 09:09:46AM -0800, Leann Ogasawara wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 22:34 -0600, Steve Conklin wrote:
> > On 01/12/2009 04:35 PM, Leann Ogasawara wrote:
> > > I assume the bugs that will get reported via the test script (apport)
> > > will also be tagged something like "apport-bug".  Steve, can you comment
> > > if the tagging I'm expecting to happen here is a valid assumption?  This
> > > will make it easy to then distinguish those bugs reported via the script
> > > vs manually reported from a user.  I could then also easily showcase
> > > this in the bug list display.
> > 
> > As it stands now, all suspend/resume bugs files by the apport automatic
> > detection will be tagged with all of the following: "suspend", "resume",
> > "hiberate", and "apport-kerneloops" (not sure of the exact spelling of
> > the last one). This can all be changed if desired, the tags are
> > hard-coded in the script.
> 
> I'd prefer the use of "apport-bug" vs. "apport-kerneloops".
> "apport-kerneloops" implies an actual Oops was detected and is being
> reported.

I think we might be stuck with whatever Steve put in his patches to
apport for the start of alpha-3, we are not likely to get apport changed
again before the release.

-apw