[PATCH 1/1] V4L/DVB (9848): gspca: Webcam 06f8:3004 added in sonixj.

[Bryan Wu]

Amit Kucheria wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 03, 2009 at 11:10:46PM +0800, Bryan Wu wrote:
>> From: Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf at free.fr>
>>
>> Bug: #374122
>> BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/jaunty/+source/linux/+bug/374122
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf at free.fr>
>> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab at redhat.com>
>> (cherry picked from commit 3319dc98a742d445a660268a6ce3426ad0922e2a)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <bryan.wu at canonical.com>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/video4linux/gspca.txt |    1 +
>>  drivers/media/video/gspca/sonixj.c  |    1 +
>>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/video4linux/gspca.txt b/Documentation/video4linux/gspca.txt
>> index 9cf57d8..a8370aa 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/video4linux/gspca.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/video4linux/gspca.txt
>> @@ -170,6 +170,7 @@ spca500		06bd:0404	Agfa CL20
>>  spca500		06be:0800	Optimedia
>>  sunplus		06d6:0031	Trust 610 LCD PowerC at m Zoom
>>  spca506		06e1:a190	ADS Instant VCD
>> +sonixj		06f8:3004	Hercules Classic Silver
>>  spca508		0733:0110	ViewQuest VQ110
>>  spca508		0130:0130	Clone Digital Webcam 11043
>>  spca501		0733:0401	Intel Create and Share
>> diff --git a/drivers/media/video/gspca/sonixj.c b/drivers/media/video/gspca/sonixj.c
>> index 53cb82d..b186609 100644
>> --- a/drivers/media/video/gspca/sonixj.c
>> +++ b/drivers/media/video/gspca/sonixj.c
>> @@ -1626,6 +1626,7 @@ static const __devinitdata struct usb_device_id device_table[] = {
>>  	{USB_DEVICE(0x0471, 0x0328), BSI(SN9C105, MI0360, 0x5d)},
>>  #endif
>>  	{USB_DEVICE(0x0471, 0x0330), BSI(SN9C105, MI0360, 0x5d)},
>> +	{USB_DEVICE(0x06f8, 0x3004), BSI(SN9C105, OV7660, 0x21)},
>>  	{USB_DEVICE(0x0c45, 0x6040), BSI(SN9C102P, HV7131R, 0x11)},
>>  /* bw600.inf:
>>  	{USB_DEVICE(0x0c45, 0x6040), BSI(SN9C102P, MI0360, 0x5d)}, */
>> -- 
>> 1.6.0.4
>>
> 
> I thought this was exactly the kind of device enablement patches that we
> would _NOT_ add to a releassed distro anymore?
> 

I agree, according to our SRU policy we should ignore this request and ask them
to try mainline build kernel, right?

-Bryan