[Jaunty] Proposing some ext4 patches

[Steve Langasek]

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 07:39:12PM +0200, Stefan Bader wrote:
> After we had https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/389555 I had a look at
> Ted's 2.6.28-stable repo to figure out, whether there might be some
> more dangers lurking. Since his 2.6.28.10 tag there are 21 patches
> difference between our and his ext4 tree. Quite a few of them are in
> a gray zone of being of little risk but do not seem to be critical
> enough to qualify for SRU. This would leave 7 (or 8) which we
> probably should consider...
> And (question to the SRU team) if we do, could we use one tracking report?

I'm fine with using a single SRU bug (i.e.: bug #389555) for all of the
ext4-related backports that are deemed appropriate, provided that there
aren't already multiple user bug reports in Launchpad for different problems
that will be fixed in this update, and that should have verification done
separately.

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer                                    http://www.debian.org/
slangasek at ubuntu.com                                     vorlon at debian.org