[PATCH][Jaunty SRU][Intrepid SRU] UBUNTU: Fix the error value in /proc/iomem passed by the kernel paramter "reserve=" on X86_64

[keng-yu.lin at canonical.com]

From: Keng-Yu Lin <keng-yu.lin at canonical.com>

SRU Justificatoin:

IMPACT: kernel parameter "reserve=" is not handled well on AMD64 and the value in /proc/iomem is not padded by 0xf in the front. The bug LP#187671 depends on this bug.

FIX: A patch from Zhang Rui fixed. The patch is also summitted to the mainline. The status on mainline bugzilla is "RESOLVED CODE_FIX". It may be merged into the mainline some day.

TEST: I tested on Karmic, Jaunty and Intrepid. The value in /proc/iomem is correct after applying this patch. The original reporter also tested on 2.6.28-11 kernel and reported to work well.

OriginalAuthor: Zhang Rui (rui.zhang at intel.com)
OriginalLocation: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13253
BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370003
Bug: #370003

Request-pull
  git://kernel.ubuntu.com/lexical/lexical-karmic.gif lp370003
  git://kernel.ubuntu.com/lexical/lexical-jaunty.gif lp370003
  git://kernel.ubuntu.com/lexical/lexical-intrepid.gif lp370003

  They are basically the same; the line numbers differ.

Signed-off-by: Keng-Yu Lin <keng-yu.lin at canonical.com>
---
 kernel/resource.c |    2 +-
 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/resource.c b/kernel/resource.c
index ac5f3a3..78b0872 100644
--- a/kernel/resource.c
+++ b/kernel/resource.c
@@ -787,7 +787,7 @@ static int __init reserve_setup(char *str)
 	static struct resource reserve[MAXRESERVE];
 
 	for (;;) {
-		int io_start, io_num;
+		unsigned int io_start, io_num;
 		int x = reserved;
 
 		if (get_option (&str, &io_start) != 2)
-- 
1.6.0.4