Natty ti-omap4

[Tim Gardner]

On 12/06/2010 04:29 PM, Dechesne, Nicolas wrote:
> Tim,
>
> On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Tim Gardner<tim.gardner at canonical.com>  wrote:
>>
>> Bryan - I pushed a natty ti-omap4 branch which was initially based on
>> Maverick ti-omap4 2.6.35-903.19. The new package version is
>> 2.6.35-1100.1, but I'm still working on some build problems. I should
>
> is there any difference between -903.19 and -1100.1? Can you explain
> what you've done?
>

No difference between Maverick and Natty other then packaging. The ABI 
has to be different so that there is no conflict with binary package names.

>> have it fixed tomorrow.
>>
>> Any status updates on rolling ti-omap4 forward to 2.6.37?
>
> we don't have, and won't have a .37 BSP for OMAP4. TI is focusing on
> .35 for now because we are adding support for power management. the
> current plan is for us to deliver a new .35 kernel with power
> management for inclusion in natty. Sebastien will be working with
> Bryan to make this. We will have everything ported over to .38 in
> February, and we will submit pull request for natty at that time.
>

OK, I guess we'll just carry the .35 kernel versions until y'all are 
ready with .38

rtg

-- 
Tim Gardner tim.gardner at canonical.com