Enable virtfs in Natty ??

Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV) jvrao at linux.vnet.ibm.com
Mon Dec 6 18:04:29 UTC 2010


On 12/6/2010 8:43 AM, Tim Gardner wrote:
> Looks to me like the only config options that aren't already enabled in Natty
> are CONFIG_9P_FSCACHE and CONFIG_9P_FS_POSIX_ACL. Do they need to be enabled?

Thanks a lot for looking into our request.

The CONFIG_9P_FS_POSIX_ACL is needed for our newly added
ACL support, and FSCACHE can be delayed as it is optional to enable caching for now.
Once we add mmap support then we need that config option also for the mmap
functionality.
For now no need to enable CONFIG_9P_FSCACHE by default.

 CONFIG_NET_9P=y
 CONFIG_NET_9P_VIRTIO=m
 CONFIG_NET_9P_DEBUG=y
 CONFIG_9P_FS=y
 CONFIG_9P_FS_POSIX_ACL=y

Also this functionality is linked to taking latest QEMU from mainline. What are
the plans for
QEMU? Depending on QEMU version config options we need enable may change too.

Thanks,
JV

> 
> rtg
> 
> On 12/06/2010 02:10 AM, Manoj Iyer wrote:
>> Team,
>>
>> Please see below details for virtfs, What are your thoughts on
>> enabling virtfs in our Natty kernel ?
>>
>> Cheers
>> manjo
>>
>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> From: Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV)<jvrao at linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> Date: Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 12:02 AM
>> Subject: Re: Hello
>> To: Manoj Iyer<manoj.iyer at canonical.com>
>>
>>
>> On 11/30/2010 12:43 PM, Manoj Iyer wrote:
>>> JV,
>>>
>>> Yes I do recall having that conversation. Can you pls refresh my
>>> memory, did you say that you were working this upstream? what is the
>>> current state of VirtFS ?
>>
>> Manoj, Thanks for your quick response.
>>
>> VirtFS is a 9P based passthrough filesystem for virtualized guests.
>> Yes we are working out of upstream and most of our work is on the mainline
>> kernel and QEMU.
>>
>> Here is the setup guide: http://wiki.qemu.org/Documentation/9psetup
>>
>> I am working out with distros like Fedora and Ubuntu to increase
>> the reach of this technology by including in distros.
>>
>> Development is still going but the upstream code has enough functionality to do
>> basic filesystem functions.
>>
>> I am not sure if Ubuntu follows Fedora model (taking latest and greatest stable
>> upstream)
>> or RHEL model. If former I think it should be relatively easy for you
>> to include.
>>
>> If you want to learn more, I will be happy to setup a call and talk to you
>>
>> More info on VirtFS:
>>
>> http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1355632/jujjuri.pdf
>>
>> http://www.linuxplumbersconf.org/2010/ocw//system/presentations/597/original/VirtFS_LPC_2010_Final.pdf
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> JV
>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV)
>>> <jvrao at linux.vnet.ibm.com>  wrote:
>>>> Hi Manoj, This is JV and I met you at Plumbers along with Darren Heart.
>>>> If you recall we discussed about including VirtFS into  next Ubuntu.
>>>> If I am getting to right manoj, can you please respond to this email?
>>>>
>>>> I would like to talk you more.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> JV
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
> 






More information about the kernel-team mailing list