Lucid pull request, LP494565

[Tim Gardner]

Scott Moser wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jan 2010, Tim Gardner wrote:
> 
>> John Johansen wrote:
>>> Tim Gardner wrote:
>>>> John,
>>>>
>>>> Can you work with Scott to make this really solves the initramfs issue?
>>>>
>>> Indeed, we had kernels built yesterday, with essentially the same patch and
>>> the issue has been on determining whether should go into -server and -pae
>>> or whether we will need another flavour.
>>>
>>> john
>> -pae ? I thought this bug was all about the virtual flavour.
> 
> Unless I'm mistaken
>    on amd64, -virtual is subflavour of -server
>    on i386, -virtual is subflavour of -generic-pae
> 

Yeah, I'd just forgotten that -virtual was also built for i386. In any
event, if these config changes are sufficient, then I don't think they
warrant a separate flavour.

rtg
-- 
Tim Gardner tim.gardner at canonical.com