[PATCH 1/5] Fix spurious segmentation faults

Bryan Wu bryan.wu at canonical.com
Fri Jul 2 05:06:23 UTC 2010


On 07/01/2010 10:15 PM, Sebastien Jan wrote:
> On 07/01/2010 07:07 AM, Bryan Wu wrote:
>> Sebjan,
>>
>> I heard this bug from Ogra before. And this patch touches the ARM common MM
>> code, I also failed to find it in upstream mainline.
>>
>> I think if you or Rob can pointed out in the git log, it is better for us to review.
>>
>> Ogra, do we have a bug in LP about this?
>>
>> BTW, CONFIG_CPU_USE_DOMAINS=n in our ti-omap4 config
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Bryan
>>

[snip]

> 
> Right, I shall have provided this info in the commit itself:
> An early version of the following patch from Catalin was integrated into our omap4 branch:
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg91260.html
> (see commit f22c4b02)
> 

Which tree is this patch in? I didn't find it.

> But there have been some updates to this patch series, which the current patch aims to cover, as it fixes some very ugly side effects.
> 

Yeah, I think this patch will be helpful, but we need some testing. Do we have
launchpad bug tracker of this bug? Ogra and Lee, are you guys aware of this bug?
I am not playing with the Maverick rootfs.

> Regarding patch author: I specified Rob as he did the investigations on the segfault we had, and find out the missing parts. We may have to credit Catalin instead/additionaly.

Rob, thanks for fixing this. But we need know more information about the
original patches and the status of this patch? Will this patch in mainline or in
the OMAP4 upstream queue? That will be much easier for us to review.

Thanks,
-- 
Bryan Wu <bryan.wu at canonical.com>
Kernel Developer    +86.138-1617-6545 Mobile
Ubuntu Kernel Team | Hardware Enablement Team
Canonical Ltd.      www.canonical.com
Ubuntu - Linux for human beings | www.ubuntu.com




More information about the kernel-team mailing list