[Bug 571663] [NEW] ti-omap flavor of ubuntu-lucid kernel does not include cm-t35 board

Eric Miao eric.miao at canonical.com
Wed Jul 28 07:14:24 UTC 2010


On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Lee Jones <lee.jones at canonical.com> wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> As I've said before and mentioned on the bug report, the team (including myself) do not have the available time to search for a suitable fix, as this board is not supported by us. I have spoken with Amit, who I believe you've been in contact with, who echoed my thoughts. I was hoping for some spare time to deal with the problem, but 'spare time' isn't a commonly muttered phrase within the Kernel Team, without 'I wish I had' prepended. Unfortunately, the Beagleboard has to take precedence over the CM-T35. If it means that much to you, either purchase a Beagleboard and complete the work yourself, or I can try (I'll make no promises, as my private life is just as busy) to take a look in my spare time.
>
> Does anyone have a CM-T35 that I can borrow for this?

Hi Mike,

My understanding is that you can provide patches for beagleboard to
boot with CONFIG_OMAP_MUX. Things will be much easier if this
patch is able to hit upstream.

I think it will be good at this time if you could help build a kernel with
your patches and for others to verify if it's breaking the beagleboard.
Once the patches are merged/Acked into -stable or .35, they are
supposed to be merged later into -lucid and -maverick.

>
> Kind regards,
> Lee
>
> On 28/07/10 02:19, Eric Miao wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 2:46 AM, Mike Rapoport <mike.rapoport at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Hi Eric,
>>> Can you please do me a favor and take a look at it:
>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/571663
>>>
>>> I don't have the BeagleBoard, otherwise I'd find the proper fix to the problem.
>>>
>>> If you don't have  time for this, just tell me, I'll understand :)
>>>
>>
>> Hi Mike,
>>
>> I doubt the CM-T35 has been enabled in lucid kernel config. And for
>> lucid, as it's a released version, unless it's a bug fix, there could be
>> less chance to get a feature to be added.
>>
>> For Maverick, I'm not sure enough. CC'ed the team in case someone
>> knows how we could help with a 3rd party board.
>>
>> - eric
>>
>
>




More information about the kernel-team mailing list