LP# 440522: FSCACHE modules not compiled in
Christian Kujau
lists at nerdbynature.de
Mon Mar 8 21:44:39 UTC 2010
Hi,
Lucid LTS is probably almost ready and maybe gone to feature-freeze
already and I worry about a pet-peeve of mine, #LP 440522. The bugreport
is reassigned between teams, even changed to WONTFIX some time ago but
there's no consensus in sight. The summary so far:
1) CONFIG_FSCACHE is already enabled in Karmic, but for this to work
(and the "cachefilesd" package to be usable at all), the according
NFS_FSCACHE resp. AFS_FSCACHE have to be enabled.
2) There was an argument that Ubuntu typically doesn't enable
EXPERIMENTAL modules - this has been resolved, AFAICT.
What's missing here? Should I generate a patch against the "linux"
package in Ubuntu? (That would qualify as an non-maintainer-upload, if
something like this exists in Ubuntu). I don't think enabling these
modules will be a real burden for the Ubuntu team, as bugs will have to be
addressed upstream as well. Also, it seems only logical to me to enable
the *FS_FSCACHE modules, otherwise the already enabled FSCACHE option
would be useless (as it is now).
Thank you for your comments,
Christian.
--
BOFH excuse #120:
we just switched to FDDI.
More information about the kernel-team
mailing list