[LUCID BUG# 507148] [PATCH 1/2] drm/radeon/bo: add some fallback placements for VRAM only objects.
Manoj Iyer
manoj.iyer at canonical.com
Fri Mar 26 21:32:56 UTC 2010
Tested the following upstream patchs on Thinkpad T42, this patch seems fix
issues with drm/compiz on ATI Radeon Mobility 7500. Please review and pull
for lucid.
The following changes since commit
762ba435f6c1050068f3372bc61a1477b0066e33:
Dave Airlie (1):
drm/radeon/bo: add some fallback placements for VRAM only objects.
are available in the git repository at:
git://kernel.ubuntu.com/manjo/ubuntu-lucid.git lp507148upstream
Dave Airlie (1):
drm/radeon/kms: don't print error on -ERESTARTSYS.
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c | 3 ++-
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>From 762ba435f6c1050068f3372bc61a1477b0066e33 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 10:32:10 +1000
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] drm/radeon/bo: add some fallback placements for VRAM only objects.
On constrained r100 systems compiz would fail to start due to a lack
of memory, we can just fallback place the objects rather than completely
failing it works a lot better.
Cc: stable at kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied at redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit 924788672f9c802a4c8e6bc8d88fbc2c9b2e3089)
Signed-off-by: Manoj Iyer <manoj.iyer at canonical.com>
BUGLINK: http://launchpad.net/bugs/507148
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h | 2 ++
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.c | 10 +++++++---
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h
index c0356bb..e1553f0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h
@@ -214,7 +214,9 @@ struct radeon_bo {
struct list_head list;
/* Protected by tbo.reserved */
u32 placements[3];
+ u32 busy_placements[3];
struct ttm_placement placement;
+ struct ttm_placement busy_placement;
struct ttm_buffer_object tbo;
struct ttm_bo_kmap_obj kmap;
unsigned pin_count;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.c
index f1da370..e781fa9 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.c
@@ -65,15 +65,19 @@ bool radeon_ttm_bo_is_radeon_bo(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
void radeon_ttm_placement_from_domain(struct radeon_bo *rbo, u32 domain)
{
- u32 c = 0;
+ u32 c = 0, b = 0;
rbo->placement.fpfn = 0;
rbo->placement.lpfn = 0;
rbo->placement.placement = rbo->placements;
- rbo->placement.busy_placement = rbo->placements;
+ rbo->placement.busy_placement = rbo->busy_placements;
if (domain & RADEON_GEM_DOMAIN_VRAM)
rbo->placements[c++] = TTM_PL_FLAG_WC | TTM_PL_FLAG_UNCACHED |
TTM_PL_FLAG_VRAM;
+ /* add busy placement to TTM if VRAM is only option */
+ if (domain == RADEON_GEM_DOMAIN_VRAM) {
+ rbo->busy_placements[b++] = TTM_PL_MASK_CACHING | TTM_PL_FLAG_TT;
+ }
if (domain & RADEON_GEM_DOMAIN_GTT)
rbo->placements[c++] = TTM_PL_MASK_CACHING | TTM_PL_FLAG_TT;
if (domain & RADEON_GEM_DOMAIN_CPU)
@@ -81,7 +85,7 @@ void radeon_ttm_placement_from_domain(struct radeon_bo *rbo, u32 domain)
if (!c)
rbo->placements[c++] = TTM_PL_MASK_CACHING | TTM_PL_FLAG_SYSTEM;
rbo->placement.num_placement = c;
- rbo->placement.num_busy_placement = c;
+ rbo->placement.num_busy_placement = b;
}
int radeon_bo_create(struct radeon_device *rdev, struct drm_gem_object *gobj,
--
1.7.0
Cheers
--- manjo
More information about the kernel-team
mailing list