[Maverick] [PATCH 0/4] KMS Disablement for i8xx
Brian Rogers
brian at xyzw.org
Wed Sep 8 08:46:20 UTC 2010
On 09/05/2010 02:05 PM, Steven wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Matthew Garrett <mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org
> <mailto:mjg59 at srcf.ucam.org>> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 05:10:11PM -0700, Leann Ogasawara wrote:
> > On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 09:52 +1000, Christopher James Halse
> Rogers wrote:
> > > Disabling KMS on these cards in Maverick will result in them
> using the
> > > VESA X driver, which has been reported to work on the various
> i8xx bugs.
>
> It's probably worth noting that a large number of 855 machines have
> native panel resolutions that aren't present in the vesa tables,
> and so
> won't be able to run in native resolution with the vesa driver.
>
>
> This has been my experience. When running the vesa driver on Lucid on
> my i855, I get:
> (EE) VESA: No valid modes.
> (EE) Screen(s) found, but none have a usable configuration.
> Then the graphics never load.
Wouldn't the fbdev X driver be a better option? I don't believe it
suffers from the same stability issues, and it should always be able to
use the native panel resolution. I'd also trust it more with
suspend/resume and VT or user switching. Does vesa have any advantages
over fbdev?
To support fbdev fallback for problem cards, the
xserver-xorg-video-intel driver would have to be patched to blacklist
i8xx cards (with support for overriding in xorg.conf), and we'd have to
make sure fbdev is tried as a fallback before vesa.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/attachments/20100908/7242d1f4/attachment.html>
More information about the kernel-team
mailing list