Retirement of fsl-imx51 in Karmic
Bryan Wu
bryan.wu at canonical.com
Tue Sep 21 07:51:36 UTC 2010
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 3:41 PM, Stefan Bader
<stefan.bader at canonical.com> wrote:
> On 09/20/2010 07:39 PM, Tobin Davis wrote:
>> Just out of curiosity, why not use the same kernel as in Lucid? They
>> are the same base kernel, just built for different HW (armv6+vfp vs
>> armv7).
>
> We could and that would be done by moving the code back from the Lucid repo to
> the Karmic repo (in order to make kernels for a release be in the release repo).
> But frankly, even this being not a big issue to do, I do not really want to
> spend any effort on something that is not used. And if every development and
> project has moved to Lucid, why bother?
>
> Ike, are you aware of any Karmic arm project for OEM that use the fsl-imx51
> branch there?
>
I agree to drop this support in karmic for fsl-imx51. No OEM project
is based on Karmic fsl-imx51.
Thanks,
-Bryan
More information about the kernel-team
mailing list