Why was linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.24_2.6.24-28.46 not built for LPIA?

[Tim Gardner]

On 01/20/2011 10:51 AM, Colin Ian King wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-01-20 at 09:52 -0700, Tim Gardner wrote:
>> On 01/19/2011 09:34 AM, Tim Gardner wrote:
>>> On 01/19/2011 07:54 AM, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 02:25:35PM +0000, Andy Whitcroft wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> In theory the meta packages should not be uploaded until the kernel and
>>>>> all of its dependant packages have been built. It sounds like one may
>>>>> have been missed here. The kernel stable team owns those packages so I
>>>>> will poke them to look into it.
>>>>
>>>> In this case the build seems to have been requested but failed
>>>> unexpectedly; likely a buildd dissappeared in the middle. We have
>>>> requested a rebuild on this package.
>>>>
>>>> -apw
>>>>
>>>
>>> Since the package builds fine in a Hardy LPIA chroot, I'm thinking
>>> soething is busted with the buildd. I've tried restarting the build to
>>> no avail. It doesn't even produce a build log.
>>>
>>> Steve or Brad - could one of you bug a Soyuz dude to investigate?
>>>
>>
>> Well, I've successfully rebuilt Hardy LUM by incrementing the upload
>> number, so I guess it was just a transient problem. I'll see about
>> getting it pocket copied to the right place.
>
> Is there anyway of automatically detecting such failures for next time
> around?
>>

Dunno, seems like it should have been noticed prior to the pocket copy.

rtg
-- 
Tim Gardner tim.gardner at canonical.com