[PATCH 4/4] NFSv4: Ensure that we check lock exclusive/shared type against open modes
Luis Henriques
luis.henriques at canonical.com
Thu Apr 19 09:45:03 UTC 2012
From: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust at netapp.com>
BugLink: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/974664
Since we may be simulating flock() locks using NFS byte range locks,
we can't rely on the VFS having checked the file open mode for us.
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust at netapp.com>
Cc: stable at vger.kernel.org
(cherry picked from commit 5de4815015e550bdd33f39650554325540356f0c git://git.linux-nfs.org/projects/trondmy/linux-nfs.git)
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques at canonical.com>
---
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
index 39c9cd2..8b16560 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -4601,6 +4601,20 @@ nfs4_proc_lock(struct file *filp, int cmd, struct file_lock *request)
if (state == NULL)
return -ENOLCK;
+ /*
+ * Don't rely on the VFS having checked the file open mode,
+ * since it won't do this for flock() locks.
+ */
+ switch (request->fl_type & (F_RDLCK|F_WRLCK|F_UNLCK)) {
+ case F_RDLCK:
+ if (!(filp->f_mode & FMODE_READ))
+ return -EBADF;
+ break;
+ case F_WRLCK:
+ if (!(filp->f_mode & FMODE_WRITE))
+ return -EBADF;
+ }
+
do {
status = nfs4_proc_setlk(state, cmd, request);
if ((status != -EAGAIN) || IS_SETLK(cmd))
--
1.7.9.5
More information about the kernel-team
mailing list