Upcoming Ubuntu Kernel Team Meeting - Tuesday, 7th of February - 17:00 (UTC)
Anca Emanuel
anca.emanuel at gmail.com
Tue Feb 7 10:36:17 UTC 2012
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 8:27 PM, Anca Emanuel <anca.emanuel at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Joseph Salisbury
> <joseph.salisbury at canonical.com> wrote:
>> The next Ubuntu Kernel Team Meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, February 7th,
>> 17:00 UTC in #ubuntu-meeting on Freenode.
>>
>> If there are any discussion points or items for decision that you would
>> like to raise, add your item to the agenda [1] and prepare a short
>> introduction on the topic to present during the meeting. As usual,
>> anyone interested in the development of the Ubuntu Kernel is welcome to
>> attend.
>>
>> [1]: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/Meeting
>>
>> --
>> kernel-team mailing list
>> kernel-team at lists.ubuntu.com
>> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kernel-team
>
> 1. There is any reason to maintain a stable kernel only for one
> distribution ? ( if you need a special all_yes config file maintain
> only that file )
> 2. Why the duplicate effort of reporting bugs ?
> 3. Why you rename the stable kernel ? ( It is 3.2.5.something not
> 3.2.0-something)
Ups, forgot to add cc to ktml (kernel-team at lists.ubuntu.com).
4. Talk with Debian and (why not ?) Fedora for an standard way to name
stable kernels.
4.1. Upstream first, and CC stable at vger.kernel.org
4.2. Report bugs upstream, forward upstream and notify the reporter.
(if you do this, I expect some heavy traffic first, but in the end
everybody will benefit from more stable mainline kernel)
More information about the kernel-team
mailing list