[Quantal][SRU][Pull Request] Fix for LP#1201869

Chris J Arges chris.j.arges at canonical.com
Mon Aug 26 14:35:57 UTC 2013


On 08/26/2013 09:23 AM, Tim Gardner wrote:
> On 08/26/2013 08:12 AM, Chris J Arges wrote:
> 
>> Eric Dumazet (5):
>>       veth: reduce stat overhead
>>       veth: extend device features
>>       veth: avoid a NULL deref in veth_stats_one
>>       veth: fix a NULL deref in netif_carrier_off
>>       veth: fix NULL dereference in veth_dellink()
>>
> 
> The first 3 patches were recently reverted for regression. Do the
> additional last 2 patches fix regressions caused by the first 3 ?

Yes. The original regression was a null pointer deference issue. The
last 3 patches (actually) fix these issues introduced by the first 2
patches. Originally I only SRUed the first 3, and missed the other two
corrections. In addition I checked the latest upstream code and did not
find any other fixes to those sections of the code.

> I can't tell what the original regression was because there is no
> information in the revert commits.

The original regression was the null pointer deference issues which were
found during validation of the original bug.

With these 5 patches, and a few weeks worth of testing I'm confident
this will address the original bug and not introduce additional regressions.

> 
> rtg
> 





More information about the kernel-team mailing list