[Quantal][SRU][Pull Request] Fix for LP#1201869
Chris J Arges
chris.j.arges at canonical.com
Mon Aug 26 14:35:57 UTC 2013
On 08/26/2013 09:23 AM, Tim Gardner wrote:
> On 08/26/2013 08:12 AM, Chris J Arges wrote:
>
>> Eric Dumazet (5):
>> veth: reduce stat overhead
>> veth: extend device features
>> veth: avoid a NULL deref in veth_stats_one
>> veth: fix a NULL deref in netif_carrier_off
>> veth: fix NULL dereference in veth_dellink()
>>
>
> The first 3 patches were recently reverted for regression. Do the
> additional last 2 patches fix regressions caused by the first 3 ?
Yes. The original regression was a null pointer deference issue. The
last 3 patches (actually) fix these issues introduced by the first 2
patches. Originally I only SRUed the first 3, and missed the other two
corrections. In addition I checked the latest upstream code and did not
find any other fixes to those sections of the code.
> I can't tell what the original regression was because there is no
> information in the revert commits.
The original regression was the null pointer deference issues which were
found during validation of the original bug.
With these 5 patches, and a few weeks worth of testing I'm confident
this will address the original bug and not introduce additional regressions.
>
> rtg
>
More information about the kernel-team
mailing list