[ 3.5.y.z extended stable ] Patch "s390/timer: avoid overflow when programming clock comparator" has been added to staging queue
Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski
herton.krzesinski at canonical.com
Fri Feb 15 17:02:54 UTC 2013
This is a note to let you know that I have just added a patch titled
s390/timer: avoid overflow when programming clock comparator
to the linux-3.5.y-queue branch of the 3.5.y.z extended stable tree
which can be found at:
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/linux-3.5.y-queue
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to this tree, please
reply to this email.
For more information about the 3.5.y.z tree, see
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/Dev/ExtendedStable
Thanks.
-Herton
------
>From 691d92ad137319e5dd84318fd1ed554bb265f30a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens at de.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2013 09:16:28 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] s390/timer: avoid overflow when programming clock comparator
commit d911e03d097bdc01363df5d81c43f69432eb785c upstream.
Since ed4f209 "s390/time: fix sched_clock() overflow" a new helper function
is used to avoid overflows when converting TOD format values to nanosecond
values.
The kvm interrupt code formerly however only worked by accident because of
an overflow. It tried to program a timer that would expire in more than ~29
years. Because of the old TOD-to-nanoseconds overflow bug the real expiry
value however was much smaller, but now it isn't anymore.
This however triggers yet another bug in the function that programs the clock
comparator s390_next_ktime(): if the absolute "expires" value is after 2042
this will result in an overflow and the programmed value is lower than the
current TOD value which immediatly triggers a clock comparator (= timer)
interrupt.
Since the timer isn't expired it will be programmed immediately again and so
on... the result is a dead system.
To fix this simply program the maximum possible value if an overflow is
detected.
Reported-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger at de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens at de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton.krzesinski at canonical.com>
---
arch/s390/kernel/time.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/time.c b/arch/s390/kernel/time.c
index c5531db..747ab28 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/time.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/time.c
@@ -121,6 +121,9 @@ static int s390_next_ktime(ktime_t expires,
nsecs = ktime_to_ns(ktime_add(timespec_to_ktime(ts), expires));
do_div(nsecs, 125);
S390_lowcore.clock_comparator = sched_clock_base_cc + (nsecs << 9);
+ /* Program the maximum value if we have an overflow (== year 2042) */
+ if (unlikely(S390_lowcore.clock_comparator < sched_clock_base_cc))
+ S390_lowcore.clock_comparator = -1ULL;
set_clock_comparator(S390_lowcore.clock_comparator);
return 0;
}
--
1.7.9.5
More information about the kernel-team
mailing list