[ 3.5.y.z extended stable ] Patch "ext4: fix xattr block allocation/release with bigalloc" has been added to staging queue
Luis Henriques
luis.henriques at canonical.com
Thu Feb 28 11:58:06 UTC 2013
This is a note to let you know that I have just added a patch titled
ext4: fix xattr block allocation/release with bigalloc
to the linux-3.5.y-queue branch of the 3.5.y.z extended stable tree
which can be found at:
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/linux.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/linux-3.5.y-queue
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to this tree, please
reply to this email.
For more information about the 3.5.y.z tree, see
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/Dev/ExtendedStable
Thanks.
-Luis
------
>From e86f22dab1efa37e7ed945b35d5646c119883def Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Lukas Czerner <lczerner at redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:12:07 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] ext4: fix xattr block allocation/release with bigalloc
commit 1231b3a1eb5740192aeebf5344dd6d6da000febf upstream.
Currently when new xattr block is created or released we we would call
dquot_free_block() or dquot_alloc_block() respectively, among the else
decrementing or incrementing the number of blocks assigned to the
inode by one block.
This however does not work for bigalloc file system because we always
allocate/free the whole cluster so we have to count with that in
dquot_free_block() and dquot_alloc_block() as well.
Use the clusters-to-blocks conversion EXT4_C2B() when passing number of
blocks to the dquot_alloc/free functions to fix the problem.
The problem has been revealed by xfstests #117 (and possibly others).
Signed-off-by: Lukas Czerner <lczerner at redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso at mit.edu>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen at redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Luis Henriques <luis.henriques at canonical.com>
---
fs/ext4/xattr.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/xattr.c b/fs/ext4/xattr.c
index 3390680..1d261e6 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/xattr.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/xattr.c
@@ -554,7 +554,7 @@ ext4_xattr_release_block(handle_t *handle, struct inode *inode,
error = ext4_handle_dirty_xattr_block(handle, inode, bh);
if (IS_SYNC(inode))
ext4_handle_sync(handle);
- dquot_free_block(inode, 1);
+ dquot_free_block(inode, EXT4_C2B(EXT4_SB(inode->i_sb), 1));
ea_bdebug(bh, "refcount now=%d; releasing",
le32_to_cpu(BHDR(bh)->h_refcount));
}
@@ -843,7 +843,8 @@ inserted:
else {
/* The old block is released after updating
the inode. */
- error = dquot_alloc_block(inode, 1);
+ error = dquot_alloc_block(inode,
+ EXT4_C2B(EXT4_SB(sb), 1));
if (error)
goto cleanup;
error = ext4_journal_get_write_access(handle,
@@ -940,7 +941,7 @@ cleanup:
return error;
cleanup_dquot:
- dquot_free_block(inode, 1);
+ dquot_free_block(inode, EXT4_C2B(EXT4_SB(sb), 1));
goto cleanup;
bad_block:
--
1.8.1.2
More information about the kernel-team
mailing list