[security-next] Pull request (merge window)

[Serge E. Hallyn]

Quoting James Morris (jmorris at namei.org):
> On Fri, 13 Jun 2014, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> 
> > Quoting Mimi Zohar (zohar at linux.vnet.ibm.com):
> > > On Tue, 2014-06-10 at 16:05 +0200, Serge E. Hallyn wrote: 
> > > > Quoting Dmitry Kasatkin (d.kasatkin at samsung.com):
> > > > > Hi Serge, Mimi and James,
> > > > > 
> > > > > Your tree contains only 2 patches from us. This is not everything.
> > > > 
> > > > (Just to be clear)  yes, I'm aware.  This was on purpose, not an
> > > > oversight.
> > > 
> > > FYI, all of the linux-integrity patches are now in linux-next.
> > > 
> > > All of the linux-integrity patches should have been upstreamed in this
> > > open window, but there are two patches that CC stable.  The first,
> > > commit "87514ce ima: introduce ima_kernel_read()" is critical and should
> > > be upstreamed in this open window.  Commit "015aed4 evm: prohibit
> > > userspace writing 'security.evm' HMAC value" is a regular bug fix, but
> > > not as critical.  Both apply cleanly to Linus' tree.
> > 
> > Ok, thanks.  I've pushed those to a new temporary tree (until I have
> > a chance to talk with James about the best way to handle all this)
> > at https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/sergeh/linux-security.git/log/?h=serge-next-2
> > I've built and boot-tested, and will send a pull request in the
> > morning if there are no objections.
> 
> Serge, how about you push everything for this release, and then I'll sync 
> up again to Linus later.

That sounds fine.  As far as I'm aware everything at this point should be
pushed, so if anyone is missing anything please do shout.

thanks,
-serge