APPLIED most: [PULL REQ][Trusty SRU] Updates for X-Gene platforms

Tim Gardner tim.gardner at canonical.com
Mon Jun 30 02:08:30 UTC 2014


On 06/29/2014 11:35 AM, Dann Frazier wrote:
> This branch includes a backported gpio driver and a couple of SATA
> fixes for the X-Gene platform.
> One of the SATA fixes is a revert of a patch that came in via upstream
> stable that causes a regression for xgene-ahci. See commit logs and
> referenced BugLinks for full details.
>
> git://kernel.ubuntu.com/dannf/trusty-xgene.git for-ubuntu-20140629
>
> Change Summary
> =============
> LP: #1334823:
> 70a09a36 UBUNTU: [Config] CONFIG_GPIO_DWAPB=m
> d1dfa16 UBUNTU: SAUCE: (no-up) arm64: dts: Add Designware GPIO dts
> binding to APM X-Gene platform
> 95ab481 gpio: dwapb: use a second irq chip
> 2e55022 gpio: dwapb: drop irq_setup_generic_chip()
> b0f208a gpio: add a driver for the Synopsys DesignWare APB GPIO block
>
> LP: #1335636:
> 950863d UBUNTU: SAUCE: (no-up) phy-xgene: Use correct tuning for Mustang
>
> LP: #1335645:
> e411219 Revert "libata/ahci: accommodate tag ordered controllers"
>

I've applied all but 'Revert "libata/ahci: accommodate tag ordered 
controllers"'. I'm pretty leery of reverting a stable upstream patch in 
order to accommodate early rev x-gene silicon. How about the approach 
suggested in (marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=140202343830821&w=2) ? That 
has the advantage of not affecting anything other then x-gene.

Is 'gpio: dwapb: drop irq_setup_generic_chip()' a candidate for 3.15 
stable ?

rtg
-- 
Tim Gardner tim.gardner at canonical.com




More information about the kernel-team mailing list