[3.19.y-ckt stable] Patch "net: don't wait for order-3 page allocation" has been added to staging queue
Kamal Mostafa
kamal at canonical.com
Mon Jul 13 22:50:21 UTC 2015
This is a note to let you know that I have just added a patch titled
net: don't wait for order-3 page allocation
to the linux-3.19.y-queue branch of the 3.19.y-ckt extended stable tree
which can be found at:
http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git/ubuntu/linux.git/log/?h=linux-3.19.y-queue
This patch is scheduled to be released in version 3.19.8-ckt4.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to this tree, please
reply to this email.
For more information about the 3.19.y-ckt tree, see
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/Dev/ExtendedStable
Thanks.
-Kamal
------
>From ab17bd6e620980c571ec7167c48aa1b813d30d2d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Shaohua Li <shli at fb.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 16:50:48 -0700
Subject: net: don't wait for order-3 page allocation
[ Upstream commit fb05e7a89f500cfc06ae277bdc911b281928995d ]
We saw excessive direct memory compaction triggered by skb_page_frag_refill.
This causes performance issues and add latency. Commit 5640f7685831e0
introduces the order-3 allocation. According to the changelog, the order-3
allocation isn't a must-have but to improve performance. But direct memory
compaction has high overhead. The benefit of order-3 allocation can't
compensate the overhead of direct memory compaction.
This patch makes the order-3 page allocation atomic. If there is no memory
pressure and memory isn't fragmented, the alloction will still success, so we
don't sacrifice the order-3 benefit here. If the atomic allocation fails,
direct memory compaction will not be triggered, skb_page_frag_refill will
fallback to order-0 immediately, hence the direct memory compaction overhead is
avoided. In the allocation failure case, kswapd is waken up and doing
compaction, so chances are allocation could success next time.
alloc_skb_with_frags is the same.
The mellanox driver does similar thing, if this is accepted, we must fix
the driver too.
V3: fix the same issue in alloc_skb_with_frags as pointed out by Eric
V2: make the changelog clearer
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet at google.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm at fb.com>
Cc: Debabrata Banerjee <dbavatar at gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli at fb.com>
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet at google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem at davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal at canonical.com>
---
net/core/skbuff.c | 2 +-
net/core/sock.c | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
index 3b0a8b0..0998af7 100644
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -4414,7 +4414,7 @@ struct sk_buff *alloc_skb_with_frags(unsigned long header_len,
while (order) {
if (npages >= 1 << order) {
- page = alloc_pages(gfp_mask |
+ page = alloc_pages((gfp_mask & ~__GFP_WAIT) |
__GFP_COMP |
__GFP_NOWARN |
__GFP_NORETRY,
diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
index a91f99f..3606cc5 100644
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -1888,7 +1888,7 @@ bool skb_page_frag_refill(unsigned int sz, struct page_frag *pfrag, gfp_t gfp)
pfrag->offset = 0;
if (SKB_FRAG_PAGE_ORDER) {
- pfrag->page = alloc_pages(gfp | __GFP_COMP |
+ pfrag->page = alloc_pages((gfp & ~__GFP_WAIT) | __GFP_COMP |
__GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_NORETRY,
SKB_FRAG_PAGE_ORDER);
if (likely(pfrag->page)) {
--
1.9.1
More information about the kernel-team
mailing list