NACK[J]: [SRU OEM-5.10/HWE-5.11/Impish/OEM-5.14/Jammy 2/3] bpf: Don't promote bogus looking registers after null check.
Andrea Righi
andrea.righi at canonical.com
Fri Jan 28 18:15:56 UTC 2022
On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 03:00:02PM -0300, Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo wrote:
> From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel at iogearbox.net>
>
> If we ever get to a point again where we convert a bogus looking <ptr>_or_null
> typed register containing a non-zero fixed or variable offset, then lets not
> reset these bounds to zero since they are not and also don't promote the register
> to a <ptr> type, but instead leave it as <ptr>_or_null. Converting to a unknown
> register could be an avenue as well, but then if we run into this case it would
> allow to leak a kernel pointer this way.
>
> Fixes: f1174f77b50c ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking")
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel at iogearbox.net>
> Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast at kernel.org>
> (cherry picked from commit e60b0d12a95dcf16a63225cead4541567f5cb517)
> CVE-2022-23222
> Signed-off-by: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo <cascardo at canonical.com>
Already applied to jammy/linux via stable updates.
-Andrea
> ---
> kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 12 ++++++------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> index 296144d71d32..797444bec1aa 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
> @@ -7822,15 +7822,15 @@ static void mark_ptr_or_null_reg(struct bpf_func_state *state,
> {
> if (reg_type_may_be_null(reg->type) && reg->id == id &&
> !WARN_ON_ONCE(!reg->id)) {
> - /* Old offset (both fixed and variable parts) should
> - * have been known-zero, because we don't allow pointer
> - * arithmetic on pointers that might be NULL.
> - */
> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(reg->smin_value || reg->smax_value ||
> !tnum_equals_const(reg->var_off, 0) ||
> reg->off)) {
> - __mark_reg_known_zero(reg);
> - reg->off = 0;
> + /* Old offset (both fixed and variable parts) should
> + * have been known-zero, because we don't allow pointer
> + * arithmetic on pointers that might be NULL. If we
> + * see this happening, don't convert the register.
> + */
> + return;
> }
> if (is_null) {
> reg->type = SCALAR_VALUE;
> --
> 2.32.0
>
>
> --
> kernel-team mailing list
> kernel-team at lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/kernel-team
More information about the kernel-team
mailing list