Format question for BlueField 22.04 patches

[Stefan Bader]

On 29.09.22 16:03, David Thompson wrote:
> +kernel-team
> 
> Looking for guidance on the format of BlueField 22.04 patches.
> 
> Thanks, Dave
> 
> *From:* David Thompson
> *Sent:* Wednesday, September 28, 2022 2:38 PM
> *To:* Dann Frazier <dfrazier at nvidia.com>
> *Subject:* Format question for BlueField 22.04 patches
> 
> Hi Dann,
> 
> Any 20.04 patches sent to the Canonical kernel team included
> 
> the following string in the Subject line:
> 
> "[SRU][F:linux-bluefield]"
> 
> 
> For 22.04 patches being sent, should the string instead be
> 
> “[SRU][F:linux-nv-bluefield]” ?

For 22.04 it should be "J:" for Jammy and after the colon whatever name we ended 
up with. As long as the local info is not wrong this would be "linux-bluefield" 
still/again.

So "[SRU][J:linux-bluefield]" for 22.04 patches.

-Stefan

> 
> Regards, Dave
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: OpenPGP_signature
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/kernel-team/attachments/20220929/0c59aa95/attachment-0001.sig>