Cmt: [jammy xilinx-zynqmp 0/1] Fix backported kria device tree changes

[Roxana Nicolescu]

On 20/02/2024 05:30, Portia Stephens wrote:
> [ Impact ]
>
> * Kria device tree's were backported from Xilinx's 6.1 tree in order to add
> support for the KD240 platform
> (https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-xilinx-zynqmp/+bug/2046280) .
> * Testing had previously been done a development branch with non-upstreamable
> patches. 3 issues were introduced to the KD240 image that was not present on
> the development branch.
> * Since all Xilinx device tree's are so interdependent all Kria and ZCU device
> trees were updated including certified platforms.
>
> [ Test Plan ]
>
> * QA will run certification testing on the KD240 platform
> * Normal certification testing will be run on all other certified platforms
>
> [ Where problems could occur ]
>
> * This impacts the device tree for certified Xilinx platforms which could break
> any of the device touched by the change.
>
> [ Other Info ]
>
> * Buglink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-xilinx-zynqmp/+bug/2054366
>
> * Private launchpad bugs that contain the regressions failure:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/limerick/+bug/2051228
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/limerick/+bug/2051224
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/limerick/+bug/2051201
>
> Portia Stephens (1):
>    UBUNTU: SAUCE: zynqmp.dtsi fix incorrectly backported changes
>
>   .../arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp-clk-ccf.dtsi |  2 +-
>   arch/arm64/boot/dts/xilinx/zynqmp.dtsi        | 42 +++++++++++--------
>   2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
Hi,

Any reason the subject does not include SRU? It messes up my filters.
The mailing list receives other type of emails, not only patches, and 
this is
what I use to filter patches. 
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/Dev/StablePatchFormat

Roxana