NAK: [SRU][n/j:linux-azure][PATCH 0/1] Backport "CIFS: New mount option for cifs.upcall namespace resolution"

John Cabaj john.cabaj at canonical.com
Tue Feb 11 15:10:03 UTC 2025


On 2/6/25 1:23 PM, Vinicius Peixoto wrote:
> BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2097564
> 
> [Impact]
> 
> Microsoft has requested for the following bugfix to be backported into the noble and jammy linux-azure trees:
> 
> db363b0a1d9e6b9dc556296f1b1007aeb496a8cf ("CIFS: New mount option for cifs.upcall namespace resolution")
> 
> [Fix]
> 
> Backported into the jammy/noble Azure trees by fixing various context conflicts.
> 
> [Test plan]
> 
> Build tested only.
> 
> [Where problems could occur]
> 
> The changeset is relatively self-contained, so the regression risk seems relatively low.
> 
> [Other info]
> 
> SF #00405264
> 
> Ritvik Budhiraja (1):
>    CIFS: New mount option for cifs.upcall namespace resolution
> 
>   fs/smb/client/cifs_spnego.c | 16 +++++++++++++++
>   fs/smb/client/cifsfs.c      | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>   fs/smb/client/cifsglob.h    | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>   fs/smb/client/connect.c     | 20 +++++++++++++++++++
>   fs/smb/client/fs_context.c  | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   fs/smb/client/fs_context.h  | 11 ++++++++++
>   6 files changed, 137 insertions(+)
> 

Agree with Magali. Upstream eb90e8ecb2b5: "smb: client: introduce 
reparse mount option" appears to add some of the missing context, but it 
doesn't appear at first glance that we need it for this particular mount 
option.


John Cabaj



More information about the kernel-team mailing list